Sharpiro won’t go!

Just send in the Goyim!

The Goyim will kneel to Yahweh’s Master Race.

Rabbi declares world powers will kneel before Israel.

All of the most powerful nations will be “taken down” as part of the Zionist’s religious mission, a rabbi thunders.

“That’s what happened in Egypt,” he says, adding that it is “going to happen” in America, Germany, France, England, Poland, Russia, China, and North Korea.

“They’re all going to go down. They’re all going to go down to their knees.

Especially the western ones …

for how they treated us over the last 2,000 years.”

They will be “taken down” and humiliated on the world stage, he rages, adding:

“We’re almost there, guys. It’s happening. And that’s going to be the ultimate firework show.

Rabbi says Western (White/European) nations will be brought down.

GRITTY APOSTLE

Because the most powerful nations in this world have to go down to their knees.

That’s what happened to Egypt.

That’s what’s gonna happen to America, to Germany, to France, to London England’s

Gonna happen to … Poland.

That’s What’s gonna happen to Russia.

That’s what’s gonna happen to China.

That’s what’s gonna happen to North Korea

They’re all gonna go down.

They’re all gonna go down to their knees.

Especially the Western ones.

The Zohar says that they’re gonna go down hard.

For how they treated us for the last 2,000 years

For the destruction of the Second Temple and how they treated us.

Hashem (God) is gonna take them down hard.

He’s gonna humiliate them and on the world stage; Western countries, Esau, Edom.

I’ll take that one; That’s what I want to see.

I don’t want anyone to get hurt, but you know let’s …

Let’s move things ahead a little bit.

So of course, the world’s going crazy now.

Things are gonna be speeding up a lot.

But we’re almost there guys.

It’s happening, this is it.

And so yeah

It’s less ethnocentric; It’s less ethnocentric.

Cause the reason’s God is doing this is for his name in this world.

And his name being made Great among Us.

We already think its name is Great.

It’s the world stage where his name is going to be made Great.

And it’s going to be the ultimate fireworks show.

That’s where the biggest Kiddush Hasheem will happen.

And when a Hashem’s name is made Great in this world.

AMEN!

Note

The Zohar (Hebrew: זֹהַר‎, romanized: Zōhar, lit. ‘Splendor’ or ‘Radiance’[a]) is a foundational work of Kabbalistic literature.[1] It is a group of books including commentary on the mystical aspects of the Torah and scriptural interpretations as well as material on mysticism, mythical cosmogony, and mystical psychology. The Zohar contains discussions of the nature of God, the origin and structure of the universe, the nature of souls, redemption, the relationship of ego[citation needed] to darkness and “true self” to “the light of God”.

In Judaism, HaShem (lit. ‘the Name’) is employed to refer to God when not in prayer, in which the term Adonai (“my master“) is used. This is to avoid pronouncing God’s name casually, a practice rooted in one of the Ten Commandments.

Kiddush HaShem (Hebrew: קידוש השם “sanctification of the Name“) is a precept of Judaism. In rabbinic sources and modern parlance, it refers to private and communal conduct that reflects well, instead of poorly, on the Jewish people.

The L.O.S.E.R. says …

TRUMP: “I always like to hang around with losers, actually, because it makes me feel better.”

“I hate guys that are very, very successful, and you have to listen to their success stories. I like people that like to listen to my success…”

“I’m only not kidding … sort

Source

Fighting the Mad Mullahs from Miami

Netanyahu’s son relaxes in Miami as US troops are sent to die in Operation Epstein Furry

Yair Netanyahu, 34, sat out every single Israeli war since 2023 (Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen), and has no plans to make Iran the exception.

As Israeli reservists are called up for their 5th, 6th or 7th tour, and US troops deployed so long they’re fathering children who grow up to take part in the same war, Yair is fine where he is, living in a luxury apartment in Hallandale Beach, loafing on his balcony and spending time with friends, and enjoying Israeli (US taxpayer)-funded Shin Bet protection.

Howard Stoffer, a former White House insider told The Express Yair’s Miami lounging is risky business.

💬 “I don’t see how it would be possible for him to be in the US and not be a highly vulnerable target for an attack or kidnapping…I think it’s foolish for him to be here. He should be doing his duty in Israel.”

But Yair apparently isn’t the only one.

In early February, several weeks before the US and Israel kicked off their surprise aggression against Iran, Yair first lady Sara Netanyahu didn’t return to Israel from Miami as expected.

According to a Ynet report, they simply didn’t show up for the flight.

It is for the GOYIM to fight and die for the Master Race.

Mass Mutiny through the ranks of the American Armed Forces

BREAKING NEWS: An unprecedented act of defiance, active-duty U.S. Army troops at multiple bases across the United States and overseas begin to refuse orders.

They do not want to deploy to the escalating war against Iran.

Soldiers and their officers publicly denounce the conflict. They declare it illegal and unconstitutional. As a result, they will not participate in an illegal war of aggression.

Videos and statements circulating from Fort Bragg (now Fort Liberty), Fort Hood, Fort Campbell, and several overseas posts show soldiers in uniform stating variations of:

‘This is not a defensive war. There is no imminent threat to the homeland. Congress never declared war.

‘We will not deploy to kill and die for oil, politics, or foreign lobbies. We swore an oath to the Constitution, not to endless wars.’

The refusals, estimated in the low thousands so far but growing rapidly, represent the most significant military dissent since Vietnam. Key developments:

Entire platoons and companies are reportedly standing down from pre-deployment training. Soldiers cite lack of congressional authorization under Article I, Section 8

Some invoke Nuremberg principles and the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) Article 92 (lawful orders only). Viral clips showing troops burning deployment orders or turning in gear en masse

Immediate fallout:

Pentagon placed multiple units on lockdown; court-martials and Article 15 proceedings already initiated

White House called the refusals ‘mutiny’ and ‘disgraceful’; Trump posted on Truth Social: ‘Traitors in uniform! We will root them out. The military must obey or be replaced.’

Defense Secretary reportedly in emergency meetings; desertion and insubordination charges expected within hours

Recruiting numbers plummeted overnight; enlistment centers saw walkouts

Social media reaction was explosive: #SoldiersRefuse and #NoWarWithIran trending #1 worldwide with over 18 million posts

Pro-troop accounts: ‘Our soldiers are heroes for refusing illegal orders’

Pro-Trump voices: ‘This is Biden’s woke military sabotaging Trump, court-martial them all’

Polls shifting dramatically: 58% of Americans now say soldiers have the right to refuse unconstitutional orders (up from 41% last month)

Legal and military experts note:

Refusal of unlawful orders is protected under UCMJ and international law, but determining ‘unlawfulness’ is complex without congressional declaration.

Mass refusal could paralyze deployment timelines and force reliance on reserves or contractors.

If proven widespread, it risks total fracture between the commander-in-chief and the force. This would be a crisis unseen since the Civil War era. Congress may be forced to act (de-authorize or declare war) to restore discipline

Troops are refusing orders. Markets are crashing. The Iran war is spiraling. The United States now faces a dual crisis. There is a military mutiny at home and an escalation abroad.

The next 24–72 hours could determine whether the chain of command holds or collapses entirely.

Are the soldiers right to disobey orders they consider unconstitutional? #SoldiersRefuse #NoIranWar #25thAmendmentCrisis

https://michaelwalshwriter.com/2026/03/17/mass-mutiny-through-the-ranks-of-the-american-armed-forces/

US HOMICIDE RATE

https://licensing.visualcapitalist.com/product/ranked-the-top-30-u-s-cities-by-homicide-rate/

Blacks Whites

New Orleans 59% 33%

Memphis, TN 64% 24%

Saint Louis, MO 45% 43%

Baltimore MD 62% 28%

Washington DC 41% 39%

Birmingham AL 69% 24%

Philadelphia PA 41% 34%

Kansai City MO 27% 55%

Richmond VA 40% 41%

Indianapolis IN 29% 53%

Milwaukee WI 39% 44%

Louisville KY 24% 66%

Cleveland OH 48% 37%

Detroit MI 78% 14%

Norfolk VA 41% 40%

Atalanta GA 48% 40%

Chicago IL 29% 34%

Jacksonville FL 31% 53%

Nashville TN 26% 57%

Dallas TX 24% 29%

Columbus OH 29% 58%

Houston TX 22% 25%

Denver CO 9% 54%

San Antonio TX 7% 25%

Cincinnati OH 42% 50%

NYC (the Bronx) 34% 12%

Rochester NY 39% 38%

Las Vegas NV 12% 42%

Portland OR 6% 70%

Oakland CA 22% 35%

Based on the most recent available official data (primarily FBI arrest statistics and DOJ reports), here are the direct, unadjusted rates for known offenses, presented without causal commentary.

Homicide (Murder & Non-negligent Manslaughter)

• Arrest Rate: Black Americans are arrested for homicide at approximately 5 to 8 times the rate of White Americans.

• Victimization Rate: Black Americans are victims of homicide at approximately 6 to 10 times the rate of White Americans. The vast majority of these homicides are intra-racial.

Robbery

• Arrest Rate: Black Americans are arrested for robbery at approximately 7 to 9 times the rate of White Americans.

Aggravated Assault

• Arrest Rate: Black Americans are arrested for aggravated assault at approximately 2 to 3 times the rate of White Americans.

All Violent Crime Index Offenses

• Arrest Rate: Black Americans are arrested for violent crimes (murder, rape, robbery, aggravated assault) at approximately 3 to 4 times the rate of White Americans.

Key Data Source Notes:

• Source: FBI Uniform Crime Reporting (UCR) Program, Arrest Data.
• “Rate” Definition: These are arrest rates per 100,000 people within each racial group, based on U.S. Census population estimates.
• Critical Limitation: Arrest data measures law enforcement activity, not total crimes committed (many of which go unreported or unsolved). Disparities in policing and reporting significantly impact these numbers.
• Intra-Racial Crime: For all racial groups, most violent crime is committed against victims of the same race.

…attack on Michigan

Wear your warm underclothes

Raising another man’s bastard – NOT!

Been there. Done that.

Good guys finish … LAST!

The female’s Powers of Rationalization are astronomical.

Something every man must now learn by himself (now that (((Femi-Nazism))) has destroyed, in great part, the Patriarchy).

Here is Gaul Atreides’s (formerly Chateau Heartiste) view:

Good gravy this is a load of horseshit. Single moms aren’t undateable because they’re terrifyingly self-sufficient; they’re ignored by men with options because those men don’t want to get wrangled into raising another man’s bastards.

Nor do they want to invest much in women proven to have poor judgement.

And single moms aren’t raising children without a man; they are raising children with the help of the government and of the civilization built by men that allows women to push papers in a cubicle to afford cheap food at a supermarket.

Ironically, when single moms usher the collapse of civilization with their shitty GoGrrl life choices, the return to a state of nature will make survival very terrifying for them, until they are so desperate for a man’s protection that she ditches the roaring cunt attitude and leaves her bastard sprog exposed on the hillside to improve her chances at landing a man.

Comments at GAB:

I withhold judgement on single moms until I see pics of her child(ren). If they are little blonde angels, she’s okay. If they were fathered by Quanavion or Shitavious, she belongs on a ghetto streetcorner. White babies are NEVER “unwanted” or “bastards.”

(so says Captain Save-A-Hoe)

Even White children can be bad seeds… I’d have to hear the story about the father, because IQ and temperament are affected by genetics, and we all know about no-accounts within our own tribe. What sort of man can produce “little blonde angels” and not stick around to see that they grow up “as a child should go”?

If that tatted up skank is actually a “mother”, I feel real sorry for the kid(s) –

unless, of course it’s a mulatto, then who gives a shit.

Where’s the niglet? you know there’s at least one there.

Single moms have been around for a long time no something is different.

Like how did she “survive” fans only? Naked or almost naked pics all over the internet, pole dancing? Fact is we have a lot more whores running around than we used to thanks to the quick money to for being an internet slut. Those teenage girls don’t realize they are ruining their future for the quick money.

Men don’t want to marry whores.

There have always been plenty of young slutty women to go around but they didn’t have their pictures and videos all over the internet so when they decided to settle down they could lower the hemline start going to church and find a man. But the pics and videos don’t go away, and your future man sees them your children will probably see them, and nobody will ever forget you were a whore.

Men don’t want to marry whores to raise their children.

I’m starting to believe that ol’ honyocker is a kike…

And how many of those bastard sprogs are black?

Once you go black do not come back.

We don’t want you back, neither.

Obviously, a single mom wrote the insert… so of course, she isn’t going to talk about the bad choices that put her in the situation, but rather gaslight how great and strong and stable her choices are now. No surprise here. Can’t really get a date by calling yourself a survivalist slut.

Good luck when the shit really hits the fan, ladies. Your DEI useless degree and single-mom status won’t be worth a thing when society collapses. Survival will be the most important thing. Food, water, shelter, guns & ammo will be the priorities. Maybe those crazy preppers aren’t so crazy after all.

Instinctively, everyone already knows this. Does anyone ever wonder why things were not like this 60 -70 years ago? If anyone did look and see the obvious causes, they would be shouted down and ridiculed. We used to do the exact opposite. The crazy would be shouted down and ridiculed.

Does @Lastof5000 really believe this communist feminist trap he’s posting? Jews invented their feminism to destroy the nuclear family, the foundation of our civilization & our purpose. They did it under the guise of “empowerment” that women are equal to men. The “freedom” that feminists talk about having, is the freedom to have sex with whomever they want whenever they want. It keeps women in a constant state of dissatisfaction, they don’t know what happiness is & are always “trying to find themselves”. It is a state of pure selfishness. If you marry a feminist, she & her career will always be first & you can still end up divorced in your old age, because she is just not happy.

I have come to learn the father is the more important of the parents. Even the girls need a strong father. What the children learn from having a feminist mother, what empowerment teaches them, is that they don’t get to have their mother in their lives as much as they need her, that a “mother” is not really necessary.

Feminist men are the weak beta males. A strong man will not fall for a feminist. They are traditional, conservatives & most are Christians.

So, yeah, I agree, it’s a buncha horseshit.

I wouldn’t call it raising.

I can make it even simpler. They aren’t worth the effort. They made bad decisions; they broadcast that continually. They expect you to be the clean up on isle 5 guy for their mistakes. They didn’t prove crap, other than they can use government assistance. In the simplest terms, a man wants a woman to build a legacy with, he doesn’t want to be the custodian of another man’s legacy. This is what makes you undatable. But ladies let me clue you in. Keep trying to bash men for your bad decisions and you will find out what it means to actually need the bears protection, cuz no man is gonna lift a finger to help you with a damned thing.

They are divorced for a reason.

Indeed. No man wants a single mom to raise “her kids” after she’s been around the block several times. Our society in the past used to shame these women (single mothers) and rightfully so because they were the whores of the town. Now, women can do as they like and they don’t like the fact that many men are passing on them. Tough choices, tough life being an adult.

Another sucker falling for the Jew plan to destroy the western Christian family structure.

Men are not likely to Marry a woman with children from another man. They want their Own children. Another factor men don’t appreciate are women with a high body count.

The more virginal the less “used”.

Moral of story: No woman should have sex until and unless they are permanently married. Men would then respect and cherish them. Women should plan to be housewives and raised their children themselves.

Just my own experience and in good faith over the decades but I found single/divorced Mom’s are usually not worth your time, energy, or care while some of the kids I would have been proud to be a father figure for.

Women’s ungodly liberation and feminism and independence are killing the USA.

Feminists feed women this man-hating stuff daily in your woman’s echo chamber.

Widows are different.

I agree with you. “Bad judgement” is the operative phrase.

Further, a single mother won’t let a good father figure correct “their child”, even when the child desperately needs it. (Look at the stat’s of boy’s raised by single mothers.) It is the absence of a man, in the home, which is the ruin of children, yet many women refuse to acknowledge it.

This is like dealing with a passel of children, which includes the mother. What man, in his right mind, would want to deal with that?

Ride it hard and make fix supper

I guess that attitude helps with the loneliness.💁🏼

I was thinking of getting some “no mudsharks” stickers printed up, would anyone be interested in a 50 pack?

Having to raise another man’s kids is voluntary reverse cuckoldry.

Having to potentially deal with fights regarding that man is a headache that most men don’t want to deal with.

Trusting a woman that has already proven she can and will treat men as expendable

Having to play third banana to a woman who will always choose her kid over you

being so self-centered that she has destroyed her child’s only chance at family.

So little regard for the child to whom you will play third banana means you don’t matter for shit.

For this and 100 other legitimate reasons it is best if you have the option to avoid single moms.

What fucking man wants to raise a child that isn’t his, a child that cannot be punished for fucking up by him , and with the very real probability of the woman still going around and fucking other men ?? Fuck that . Raising the child on their own ?!? Seriously ?!? Yeah , but ….no . That’s not an accurate description . Pioneer women, when widowed actually did it on their own . Today’s woman isn’t even a shadow of a real, strong woman . I said what I said and mean it.

All sluts with bad body art are safe.

The self-delusion is astonishing to watch, and those that cannot easily see through it demonstrate their own delusions. This society is becoming unbearable.

If The Force were comprised of Cope and Hamster Rationalization, these broads could take on Darth Vadar AND the Kwisatz Haderach simultaneously … and make the fight look like Godzilla versus Bambi.

So you’re against adoption too according to this post. I mean when you adopt a child its some other man’s “bastard” right?

And I guess the men who are sterile for some reason should just live with that fact and not want children at all.

Not all men feel the way you do.

Geez, Louise, woman… NAxALT is a given in all debates… but trying to use it as a gainsay to the general truth of the point being made is the weakest sister gambit imaginable.

Tend to your kitchen, men are talking here. (smdh)

“Not all men feel the way you do”

We know that. That’s why the OP called them what they are: cuckolds.

Willing, consciously-chosen cuckoldry.

Willing cuckolds exist, obviously, but they ought to be mercilessly shamed and bullied, because it is a shameful state of affairs for any man to find himself in. Adopting does nothing to alleviate that shame – it’s still taking care of another man’s child, another man’s responsibility, without any of that man’s authority.

Absolutely unacceptable for most men, cuckolds notwithstanding. You, as a woman, don’t have to like it, but it isn’t your decision, it’s men’s decision. What you would like or prefer is totally irrelevant – it’s OUR call to accept or deny a single mom and make whatever demands of her we choose if we do accept her. A decent starting point would be to demand two of our own children from her for every one bastard she already has. If she doesn’t want that, great – we’ll walk away, no harm no foul.

Only immature strumpets with the thousand cock stare says that anyone advocating traditional marriage would change the subject to adoption. You are incapable of thinking that women can be anything other than aggressive whores, getting pregnant out of wedlock.

I assume that meme is supposed to be GrrrlBoss, instead of funny.

Yeah, missed hard on that one…

They DON’T raise a child without a man; they raise a child without a father. They replaced the patriarchy of a husband and traditional marriage with the patriarchy of a boss or the government …

Most are either mudsharks or skanks that cheated on their first husband.

The woman pictured looks more like a single grandmother to me.

Got nothing to do with you being a single mother and has everything to do with your attitude. I’ve dated single mothers in my dating days and can tell you from personal experience most of the ones I’ve been involved with turned out to be bat shit crazy wonder if it’s just a coincidence they also turned out to be liberal? I’m not saying all just most.

I also made this mistake, and it was the worst experience. A nuance I ran into is that the single mom’s family and even ex-husbands both do the heavy financial lifting, so they just have low income ‘fun’ jobs to have additional spending money while the child support pours in.

This translates into them not needing a man as anything but a temporary f boy and event payer. They are completely unable to bond and will detach completely overnight once the dopamine stops. You are her last priority behind another man’s kids. Never date and don’t even do the recreational use. Becoming involved with these types is degrading to a man in every single aspect you can think of.

Strong woman with whore tats taking a skank selfie to use as her tinder pic so she can be pumped and dumped.

Or it could be the tattoos.

A perfect analogy.

Gambling, prostitution and intoxicants money makers in the worst of economies.

They think they’re Katniss from The Hunger Games,, but in reality they’re that “me so horny” skank from Full Metal Jacket.

Complete and utter b.s. These women are undateable because they have no core values and jump from man to man using the excuse that a man can’t handle them. Strong men don’t want them because they don’t want to be an adversarial relationship and in constant conflict in the household.

Proverbs 21;9 says it is better to live on a corner of the housetop than to share a house with a contentious woman. Just one such verse.

And close to 90% of the ones I have dated had several kids and not the same fathers, have to get a valet for father’s day. If you are too stupid to let some fuck cum in you, you are just stupid.

AI and The Creativity Divide

Vox Day is an endless source of crucial information.

Here he links to an article about the influence AI will have on work and jobs.

Good news and Bad news.

Good news for those who exert their minds and “create”; AI will be a tool.

Sad news for the (lazier?) crowds of trend followers; AI will replace them.

Here is the article; the yellowing is my own editorializing.

The Band contemplates the ways in which AI will continue to separate the sheep from the goats in creating a creativity divide.

The notion users really need to know what they’re doing holds the mirror to useless modern busy workers. If you can be replaced by a flawed talking search engine, what was your true value added?

But it also holds a mirror of me, the user. Note how my answer to it up above used the phrase “outsourcing the whole chain of thought.” Shortly after, DeepSeek describes the…

Passivity Trap: Why struggle to write, code, or analyze when AI can do a “good enough” job? The entire chain of thought can be outsourced.

This is one example. It commonly asks me questions, adopts my own wording, and gives it back to me. This makes it seem more agreeable and complementary. It’s excellent for augmented intelligence. As it adapts to your patterns, it is more able to anticipate your needs. But it makes NPCs feel smart. Not because they are. Because it’s a mirror on every level.

As for the elite/mass cognitive split that I think is likely, DeepSeek says it’s already happening with AI use.

It explained what it calls a Creativity Divide between people who use AI for brainstorming vs. those who treat it as a final authority. It’s connected to critical thinking and that circles back to NPC.

“Elite” thinking is what we’ve been discussing in these chats.

RI. Real Intelligence. Users who understand and think well enough to run the AI. Catching errors, pushing fallacies, and designing the right queries and prompts. DeepSeek summed it up like this while throwing some shade at the competition.

Elites cross-examine AI outputs; masses accept them as gospel (see: ChatGPT-generated misinformation spreading uncritically).

And the economic impact is just as harshly divided. High-functioning workers will use AI in the right places to augment their productivity. Low-functioning workers will get replaced.

It’s not surprising. This split is always with us. It’s part of the human condition. Readers and non-readers. Learners and CLI. AI is a mirror. The divided use patterns with it reflect the FTS division with pretty much everything. What it does is sharpen it.

We’re about to hit this in a big way in the music industry.

While most of the outspoken musicians are posturing angrily and preaching about the AI apocalypse, the smarter ones are quietly mastering the AI tools and using them to produce better results.

This creativity divide is going to become increasingly obvious as soon as the middle of next year.

I asked DEEPSEEK about smart, high IQ, people and AI.

CLI – CLI: Command Line Interface (The “Work” Tool) (DeepSeek has a LONG answer)

FTS – Financial Transaction Services (Do go ask DeepSeek for its long explanation)

BTW- AI and the near future

IQ – China has around approximately 5,415,000 people with and IQ of 140 or MORE.

STEM – China graduates well over 2 million students in STEM fields at the bachelor’s level EVERY year.

AI – China’s AI policy is a holistic national strategy that treats AI as the key to future economic dominance, social stability, and geopolitical power. It leverages the country’s scale, data, and state-capitalist model to pursue a coordinated effort across industry, government, and the military. While it faces challenges, particularly in semiconductor independence and attracting top global talent, its systematic and determined approach makes it a primary competitor to the United States in shaping the global AI landscape.

IQ – USA: Approximately 4.3 million people in the United States have an IQ of 140 or higher.

The Western world (non-US Anglo-sphere, Europe, Swiss); based on this definition and statistical model, approximately 3.55 million people in the Western World have an IQ of 140 or more.

STEM degrees USA: Graduates roughly 550,000 STEM students at the bachelor’s level annually.

Western World : Graduates roughly 1.4 – 1.6 million STEM students at the bachelor’s level annually.

AI – Western policy landscape is a multi-layered effort to harness the economic and social benefits of AI while building guardrails to protect its citizens’ rights and democracies. The transatlantic partnership between the U.S. and the EU is crucial in this endeavor, as they collectively seek to offer an alternative to the state-centric AI model championed by China.

Note: I only compared China, the preeminent industrial power, to the previous eminences; if I were to include Russia, the Global South…

“Ask (DeepSeek) and an answer will be given to you!”

Proportion of women engaged in high-risk professions

Feminists have been claiming for decades that women make up ONLY 85% of the salary Men make.

And thus, there should be AFFIRMATIVE ACTION to increase women’s revenue.

Women want EQUALITY with men; the Feminists say.

NEVER! (I was in “social sciences: (sic), eons ago am now in education) have I NEVER heard Feminists requiring that women take 50% (equality) of the high-risk, high reward professions. EVER!

They want EQUALITY for their cushy, SAFE, temperature-controlled, white-collar jobs in offices; they have been a plague in HR ever since.

Feminism; dis-honest at its core.

My take: in high-risk professions, women (LESS than 10% of the work force) women are concentrated in office and administrative support roles rather than the most hazardous jobs.

Keep this in mind while looking at the photos; they are lying Woke propaganda.

Here is a list of the proportion of women in HIGH PAYING but HIGH-RISK professions.

I asked DeepSeek (the Chinese non woke AI):

What proportion of women are engaged in high-risk professions : mining, fishing, forestry, firefighting, police force, military special forces and so on?

This is a clear and measurable question.

Women are significantly underrepresented in the majority of these high-risk, physically demanding professions.

Here is a detailed breakdown of the proportion of women in each of the fields you mentioned, based on data from the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) and other relevant U.S. government sources.

Overall Summary

Across almost all these professions, women make up a small minority of the workforce, often less than 10%. The exceptions are the police force and the military as a whole, where representation is higher, though still far from equal, especially in frontline combat and special forces roles.

Detailed Breakdown by Profession

Logging (Forestry)

This is consistently ranked one of the most dangerous jobs in America.

Logging (Forestry)

Proportion of Women: Approximately 8% of logging workers.

Key Insight: The physical demands and extreme hazards (falling trees, heavy machinery) have historically resulted in very low female participation.

Mining (Oil, Gas, Coal, Quarrying)

This is one of the most male-dominated sectors.

Proportion of Women: Approximately 14% of all mining, quarrying, and oil and gas extraction workers.

Key Insight: Within this category, women are often concentrated in office and administrative support roles rather than the most hazardous extraction (e.g., operating drilling rigs, working underground) roles.

Fishing and Hunting

Proportion of Women: Approximately 9% of fishers and related fishing workers.

Key Insight: This is a very small occupation overall, and the work is extremely dangerous due to weather, heavy equipment, and isolation.

Firefighting

Proportion of Women: Approximately 5% of firefighters are women.

Key Insight: This number has been slowly increasing but remains very low. Barriers include rigorous physical fitness tests, a traditionally male-dominated culture, and a lack of recruitment outreach to women.

Police Force

Proportion of Women: Approximately 13% of sworn police officers.

Key Insight: This is higher than the other physical safety roles listed but is still far from representative of the general population. Representation is even lower in leadership ranks (e.g., police chiefs).

Military

This requires a more nuanced look, as roles vary widely in risk.

Overall Military: Women make up about 17.5% of the active-duty U.S. military.

Combat Arms Roles: This is where the most significant underrepresentation exists. Since all combat roles were opened to women in 2015, participation has grown but remains low.

Infantry: Approximately 5-7% of infantry personnel are women.

Special Forces (e.g., Army Green Berets, Navy SEALs): The proportion is well below 1%. The first woman graduated from Army Special Forces training (to become a Green Beret) in 2020. As of now, only a handful of women have served in the Navy SEALs pipeline, with none yet achieving the final designation.

Summary Table

Profession Proportion of Women (Approx.) Notes

Mining 14% Often in support roles; underrepresented in core extraction.

Fishing 9% One of the smallest and most dangerous occupations.

Logging 8% Consistently ranked the 1 most dangerous job.

Firefighting 5% Slow but steady increase over the past decades.

Police Force 13% Higher than others, but low in leadership and specific units (e.g., SWAT).

Military (Overall) 17.5%

Military (Infantry) 5-7% Growing since combat roles opened in 2015.

Military (Special Forces) < 1% Extremely rare; physical and cultural barriers are significant.

Key Reasons for Underrepresentation

The low numbers are not due to a single factor but a combination of:

1. Physical Requirements: Many of these jobs have strict physical strength and endurance standards that, on average, can be more challenging for women to meet, though many do.

2. Historical and Cultural Barriers: These fields have deep-seated traditions and cultures that have been predominantly male for generations, which can be unwelcoming or create a “chilly climate” for women.

3. Lack of Role Models and Recruitment: With few women in these roles, there are fewer visible examples to encourage others to join.

4. Workplace Environment: Issues like harassment, lack of appropriate facilities (e.g., properly fitting gear, separate bathrooms), and work-life balance challenges can deter women from entering or staying in these fields.

5. Perceived Risk: The inherent danger of the jobs may also influence career choices, though this is a personal decision for individuals of any gender.

In conclusion, while women are present in every one of these high-risk professions, they remain a distinct minority, often constituting less than one in ten workers, with their representation becoming exceptionally rare in the most elite and physically demanding special operations roles.

SHORT VERSION:

they remain a distinct minority, often constituting less than one in ten workers, with their representation becoming exceptionally rare in the most elite and physically demanding special operations roles.

.