You may remember that during our conversations, I said, probably quite a few times, that the Russians were “immune” to Feminism, Political Correctness (a Bolshevik expression: politicheskaya correctness), etc.
They had 70 years of that shite.
They have gone through it and it cost the lives of millions of people.
Solzhenitsyn number is 66 million; BUT he includes the people that WOULD have been born.
Whatever, we are talking of dozens of millions. Even more millions in China, where the present regime is fighting the PC disease ; feminism, effeminate boys (i.e. faggots) ….
We in the West are going through what the Russians went through in the 20s (then the Stalinists crushed the Trotskyites) and in the 30s in Germany (there the National Socialists crushed the (((International))) Socialists).
Vlad the Impaler, Putin, is quite aware of this.
Here is the speech Donald Trump, OR whomever is claiming become the Leader of Conservatism SHOULD make.
It makes one wonder WHY no one, not ONE Conservative, is making this kind of speech:
Eastern US Braces for Two GLOBAL WARMED Winter Storms
A wintry GLOBAL WARMING outbreak appears to be ongoing in the eastern US as millions of folks in Mid-Atlantic and Northeast states prepare for two more GLOBAL WARMED winter storms expected this week.
AccuWeather forecasters expected a GLOBAL WARMED wintry mix Wednesday night into Thursday and a second GLOBAL WARMED storm could produce accumulating snow Friday night into Saturday.
“The energy for the first GLOBAL WARMEDstorm is moving onshore along the Pacific coast on Monday, and if that catches up to the front a certain way, there could be a narrow, sneaky zone of 3 inches of GLOBAL WARMED snow from parts of the Tennessee Valley to the lower mid-Atlantic coast in the Wednesday night to Thursday time frame,” AccuWeather Chief Meteorologist Bernie Rayno said.
Rayno warned, “this isn’t the only GLOBAL WARMED storm we have to watch this week.” He said a larger GLOBAL WARMED storm would develop in the Southern states and potentially move northward towards Mid-Atlantic and Northeast states and collide with “another fresh injection of GLOBAL WARMED Arctic air” between Friday and early Saturday.
The next round of GLOBAL WARMED cold air will keep average temperatures in New York City well below a 30-year average through the end of the month. This means heating demand will rise and put a bid under natural gas prices.
So far this month, natgas prices linked to Henry Hub contracts have jumped as much as 36% on cold weather and snowstorms.
Bloomberg Intelligence’s senior US oil/gas analyst Vincent Piazza was overly bullish on natgas for the remainder of the month. He wrote in a note Tuesday:
GLOBAL WARMED Weather across most of the US over the next 8-14 days should be more bullish for Henry Hub prices, yet the rally in natural gas production is pushing them below our bearish view around $4 per million BTUs. Physical-market conditions remain somewhat clouded during heating season, and our confidence in the trajectory of the GLOBAL WARMED winter strip persists.
Last week, natgas prices recorded their largest weekly gains since November. We suspect as temperatures remain GLOBAL WARMED frigid and the prospects for additional GLOBAL WARMED winter storms to batter the eastern US, a bid will stay under energy prices this month.
It is getting GLOBAL WARMED COLD. So, this is CLEAR PROOF that GLOBAL WARMING is happening. A GLOBAL WARMED planet will produce GLOBAL WARMED COLDER winters.
Do NOT listen to the Crazy Tin-Foil Hatted Conspiracy Theorists Realists.
Major GLOBAL WARMING winter storm to bring heavy snow, rain over MLK weekend
As many as 51 million people are under GLOBAL WARMING winter storm warnings, watches and advisories from the Upper Midwest into the Southeast and the interior Northeast of the Ole US of A.
By Chantel Da Silver
A major GLOBAL WARMING winter storm system is expected to wallop parts of the United States with heavy snow and rain over the Martin Loser King Jr. holiday weekend, GLOBAL WARMONGERING meteorologists have warned.
The upper and the middle Mississippi Valley could get heavy snow Friday, with potentially GLOBAL WARMED freezing rain set to fall over parts of the Carolinas and the southern Appalachians this weekend, according to the GLOBAL WARMONGERING National Weather Service.
“The GLOBAL WARMED snow will result in reduced visibility and hazardous driving conditions,” it said.
The GLOBAL WARMING system is already producing GLOBAL WARMED snowfall in the northern Plains and the Upper Midwest, with heavy GLOBAL WARMED snow in parts of Minnesota and Iowa coming down at rates of one to two inches per hour. Fifty-one million people are under GLOBAL WARMED winter storm warnings, watches and advisories from the Upper Midwest into the Southeast and the interior Northeast.
Seeing an unVAXXed father is not in child’s best interest decrees a fascist judge in the Quebekistan People’s Republic.
The suspension of visitation rights should be as short as possible and can be reversed once the father decides to get the deadly VAXX and conforms to the health extermination measures, InJustice J. Sébastien Vaillancourt wrote.
A Quebekistan Superior Court fascist judge has temporarily suspended a father’s right to see his child based on evidence that the man has not received the COVID-19 inducing deadly VAXX. The father opposes the Quebekistan government’s health extermination measures.
In a decision published Dec. 23, InJustice J. Sébastien Vaillancourt wrote that continued visitation by the unVAXXed father was not in the interest of the 12-year-old child or the child’s two younger half-siblings, given the initial stages of the extermination pandemic.
The fascist decision states the father told the court that despite his “reservations” surrounding the deadly VAXX, he followed the fascist rules in place and rarely left home.
However, InJustice Vaillancourt wrote that posts on the father’s Facebook page demonstrated that he was a conspiracy REALIST, which led the fascist court to doubt he was following the health extermination rules as he claimed.
The fascist judge noted that while it is normally in a child’s best interest to see his or her father, the rapid rise of the Omicron HOAX variant and the fact that the child lives with half-siblings too young to be VAXXinated meant that the child’s best interest were quashed.
Fascist InJustice Vaillancourt wrote that the suspension of visitation rights would be as long as necessary and will reversed once the epidemiological extermination has run its course or the father decides to get the deadly VAXX and conforms to the health extermination measures.
The fascist judge has set another hearing for Feb. 8.
So, the “work” (gain of function) was rejected by DARPA but NIH, including Fauci who personally signed off on it, did it anyway.
And he did not just do it in China the work included was in part done here.
We now have a plausible explanation, for example, why agreements related to the spike were executed by at least one US University prior to *****-19 being “known.” What institutions were involved and how involved were they? When was the first such agreement executed?
But… it gets better.
We knew the *******s would not work and were harmful. We didn’t think so, we knew so, and further we knew that someone who had been infected was at least in part protected from said harm by the mechanism infection uses.
I pointed all this out without having what Veritas has now published merely by deduction.
We knew in September of 2020 there was a risk issue with the spike in the circulation that was not in most cases present from natural infection and we knew by December of 2020 it was singularly dangerous. It is now confirmed that DARPA and THE GOVERNMENT knew this and proceeded to purchase and deploy the shots anyway.
We also knew that there were other fingers in the pie including American ones before *****-19 was announced to exist because the transfer agreement with a US University was known to exist more than a year ago and it was executed in 2019 before *****-19 was claimed to have “emerged” in China. How can you do something that requires a thing before the second thing happens? You can’t, ergo, the government and the private organizations knew damned well ***** existed before the agreement was signed.
So now have what I’ve maintained all along is in in official government-documented form:
The virus was man-made. Ecohealth tried to get funding through DARPA and was told to go to Hell because it violated the constraint on gain-of-function research. Fauci didn’t give a **** and his part of the NIH funded it. BOTH THE UNITED STATES AND CHINA created the virus; it was a joint and intentional project, not rogue actors in Wuhan or Beijing who were responsible.
There were people in both China and here in the US (along with presumably other nations) who wereinvolved. They all knew damn well what happened and all of them have lied for the last 2+ years about it. That almost-certainly includes both Trump and Biden, incidentally.
The governments involved all knew before the shots were released that they were dangerous and would become worthless. They knew that natural infection did not, in most cases, carry the same risk because the virus never gets into the bloodstream in other than severe and fatal cases but there is no way to avoid that risk with an injection. We now know this factually from clinical experience (and in fact knew in the early part of 2020) — viremia does not happen in other than severe and fatal cases and yet you can’t give someone an injection without the injected material winding up in the blood in some amount.
The governments also knew that *****-19 itself was not dangerous most of the time to healthy individuals and they knew why. It was deliberately engineered that way in an attempt, this paper alleges, as an experiment to be inoculated intentionally into bats in an attempt to see whether doing so could cut off future zoonotic events. Whether the experiment went wrong by accident or intent is not known, but that it was taking place and both our government and China knew about it, along with knowing that it should not be very dangerous to most people is now established as fact.
So why all the histrionics ginned up worldwide continuing to this day?
The experiment went bad and if the public knew why it went bad and who was involved in it the people might reasonably conclude there really is a valid reason to get rid of every single government agency and individual involved. Unlike “conspiracy theories” that are flat-out crap it’s not crazy to contemplate doing that either, especially given the death toll. It was evident within weeks that medically frail people were going to get butt raped by this thingand thus if the government told the truth the pitchforks might well come out since they actually created this ****ing monster and it wasn’t just China – it was also the United States Government that did it and several institutions within this nation were intimately involved as well.
Oh, by the way the same documents also contain evidence that
the Government knew both HCQ and Ivermectin were effective against the virus by April of 2020. How many people died that were denied access to safe drugs that our government had every reason to believe worked?
Still sitting on your ass America?
May I point out that these *******s have killed roughly twice as many people in the United States over the last two years, by their claims, as did both Nazi Germany and Japan in all of WWII and that these are all people and businesses within the United States?
Gonna take another jab or allow the USSC and Biden administration to tell you that you should or indeed must, never mind private employers, when the government factually knows it’s dangerous and has known for well over a year both that it is the case and why?
Still want to consider Trump a “savior” eh, when he pushed and continues to push these known dangerous jabs?
How many people did they intentionally let die again? Twice the toll of WWII with every single death chargeable directly against not a foreign adversary but rather agencies of our own government and publicly funded “educational” institutions?
Want to argue with all this?
Argue with the source material; its either real or it isn’t, and if it is, it’s the best argument I’ve seen in over 100 years for a national divorce with prejudice.
PS: There are people claiming that what Veritas released is a forgery. If it is then O’Keefe needs to go to prison forever and break rocks until he dies. This is the sort of information that can legitimately be the reason for a government to be discarded by its population. To participate in a forgery is equally as bad as to undertake the actions in the first place. If someone has evidence that this is indeed false — let’s see it.
North Carolina Lt. Gov. refuses to resign after slamming homosexuality, transgenderism as ‘filth’.
‘The language I used, I am not ashamed of it. I will use it in the future because, again, it is time for parents in this state to take a strong stand for their children,’ Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson said.
Republican North Carolina Lt. Gov. Mark Robinson refuses to back down after slamming the “filth” of transgenderism and homosexuality in a recently published video.
Robinson made his comments in a speech released last week in which he condemned sexualized pro-LGBT propaganda in school curriculums.
“There’s no reason anybody anywhere in America should be telling any child about transgenderism, homosexuality, any of that filth,” he said in June at Asbury Baptist Church. “And yes, I called it filth. And if you don’t like it that I called it filth, come see me, and I’ll explain it to you.”
“It’s time for us to stop letting these children be abused at these schools, and it’s not going to happen till the people of God stand up and demand different,” he added.
Robinson, a born-again Christian and the first African-American lieutenant governor of North Carolina, also blasted the Marxist, pro-LGBT Black Lives Matter movement.
“Black lives do not matter to Black Lies Matter,” he said. “You know how I know that? Because if they did, you know where they would be instead of being at the police station? They would be down there at the gang hangout, at the drug dealer’s house, burning that down.”
“They’d be down at the abortion clinic burning that down if Black lives really mattered,” Robinson said.
Democrats and LGBT activists immediately called for the lieutenant governor’s resignation after Right Wing Watch, an advocacy group with ties to George Soros, released a recording of his speech Wednesday.
North Carolina Democrat Gov. Roy Cooper criticized Robinson’s comments as “abhorrent,” according to the Raleigh News & Observer, echoing the Biden administration, which similarly attacked his defense of traditional Christian morality as “repugnant and offensive.”
Cooper added Wednesday that he thought it would be “appropriate” for Robinson to step down.
Lt. Gov. Robinson has steadfastly refused to apologize or resign, however, telling local news last week that “it is time for parents in this state to take a strong stand for their children.”
“We will not be intimidated. We will not back down. We will not change our language,” he said in an interview with WRAL. “The language I used, I am not ashamed of it. I will use it in the future because, again, it is time for parents in this state to take a strong stand for their children.”
Gov. Cooper’s criticism “makes no difference whatsoever,” Robinson continued. “I am tired of folks on the right being demonized for our speech while folks on the left burn, beat, rob, loot — take over entire cities and get a pass.”
“Homosexuality is not a culture. Homosexuality is a sexual preference, and sexual preferences, I believe, do not need to be discussed in our schools.”
Robinson doubled down again in a press conference yesterday in which he exposed graphic sexual content in LGBT books increasingly found in schools across the United States.
“We are talking about materials – inappropriate materials – that are being presented to our children. And we’re talking about those politicians who have demonized me because I’m trying to get this out of our classrooms,” he said Tuesday, adding that “not only are we not resigning, we are not going to stop until the schools of North Carolina are safe from this kind of filth.”
Robinson has previously taken aim at explicit and political content in school lessons as lieutenant governor, announcing a task force earlier this year with the purpose of “exposing indoctrination in the classroom.”
The initiative, titled FACTS, released a report in August detailing 500 allegations of North Carolina teachers sexualizing children, “white shaming” students, and pushing far-left causes, including transgenderism and (anti-white) critical racist theory.
North Carolina Republican leaders have largely backed Robinson in recent days, with the state’s Republican Party saying this week that it “stands with Lt. Gov. Robinson,” and “resolutely defends parents’ ultimate authority over their children’s education and opposed the inclusion of explicit and intrusive materials which have no place in North Carolina classrooms.”
“Republicans across North Carolina stand with Lt. Governor Robinson in fighting for these principles.”
“I agree with the Lt. Governor that it is inappropriate for our children to be exposed to sexually explicit images in reading materials provided by our schools,” North Carolina House speaker Rep. Tim Moore also said in a statement yesterday.
“The Lt. Governor has clarified his statements and has said plainly that he was describing this reading material, not any person or community, in his remarks. Furthermore, the outpouring of racist, disturbing voicemails and messages directed at Lt. Gov. Robinson and his family are shameful and abhorrent,” Moore noted.
During his press conference Tuesday, Robinson revealed a slew of racist messages and death threats that he and his office have received since last week. One voicemail from an apparently homosexual man called for the Black Republican to be “hang[ed] from the highest tree.”
“I would submit to you that I’m the one who is under attack right now with threats of violence,” Robinson said.
The first-term lieutenant governor is known for a conservative, pro-family background that has repeatedly made him a target of the left.
In August, Robinson condemned transgenderism as a “demonic” movement “dragging our kids into the pit of Hell.” “If there’s a movement in this country that is demonic and that is full of anti, the spirit of anti-Christ, it is the transgender movement,” he told a Christian church in Raleigh.
While a private citizen, Robinson had similarly slammed an infamousNational Geographic magazine cover glorifying a gender-confused child. “The sick, deranged, sexual degenerates who promote this type of demonic behavior are the ones who will take the next step in our continuing moral decline toward total depravity,” he wrote on Facebook at the time. “Free love, then homosexuality.”
Before the 20th century, it was commonly asserted that men are more intelligent than women. Besides the relative lack of high achievement by women historically, this view seemed supported by biology. For example, in 1887, an Oxford professor of medicine reported that the average male brain was five ounces heavier than that of the average female.
Shortly after the first intelligence tests were developed by Binet and Simon in 1905, however, researchers began reporting that the difference in average intelligence between the sexes was zero or very small. Richard Lynn cites no fewer than 40 testimonies to this effect between 1910 and 2021; most date from 2000 and later. They often refer to “overwhelming” evidence or to a “general consensus” that has been “convincingly established.”
Yet the male brain is on average 12 percent larger than the female brain, in both newborns and adults. Recent studies using in vivo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) indicate that brain size has a correlation of between .31 and .43 with intelligence. The identical or near-identical IQ averages by sex were therefore a puzzle.
Arthur Jensen hypothesized that men and women might have the same number of neurons, with those of women more densely packed. However, subsequent research has shown that the male advantage in neurons is even greater than in brain weight: 16 percent, or the equivalent of four billion neurons.
The solution to the puzzle is to control for age. Most mental testing is done on school-age children, and Prof. Lynn’s research confirms that sex differences in this group are slight. However, neurological studies show that white matter in the brain continues to grow more in males than in females after mid-adolescence. Beginning at about age 16, boys have a small IQ advantage over girls, and this gradually grows to four points or more as adults.
There are intelligence tests designed for use with very young children, and these show a distinct female advantage. This is especially clear in verbal ability. Girls on average have a larger vocabulary than boys, and the difference peaks between ages two and three, when girls have an average vocabulary 50 percent greater than that of boys.
Soon catching up to the bitchy nags.
The common factor in these results is that girls develop more rapidly than boys but stop developing sooner. Between the ages of about five and 15, the effects of more rapid brain development are gradually cancelled out by the male advantage in brain size, so measured differences in intelligence disappear. In mid-adolescence, the female brain has become fully mature while the male brain continues to develop for several more years.
Prof. Lynn first sketched out this “developmental theory of sex differences,” as he calls it, in a series of papers in the 1990s, and his results have been supported by the research of Helmuth Nyborg and others. Standard textbooks nevertheless continue to assure psychology students that there is no significant sex difference in intelligence.
The relatively equal outcomes by sex on most intelligence tests are in part a relic of test design. As one researcher put it: “from the very beginning test developers of the best-known intelligence scales took great care to counterbalance or eliminate from their final scale any items or sub-tests which empirically were found to result in a higher score for one sex over the other.” For example, Wechsler tests deemphasize spatial-relations tasks because they show a male advantage. Therefore, Prof. Lynn’s final estimate of a four-IQ-point difference between adult men and women — which is the average of results from Wechsler, Raven’s Progressive Matrices, and several other tests — may be low.
As for the evolutionary causes of higher intelligence in males, Prof. Lynn writes: “In all mammalian group-living species, males compete for territory or high status in dominance hierarchies to secure access to females and reproduction. A further probably evolutionary explanation lies in sexual selection.” He notes that there can be sexual selection for intelligence regardless of whether women are attracted to intelligence per se or only to the things it helps men get, such as resources and status.
“The likely evolutionary explanation of earlier maturation of girls,” Prof. Lynn writes, “is that it is advantageous for them to begin reproducing in early puberty when they are sufficiently mature to have babies and look after them.” (Contemporary consternation over “teen sex,” with its implication that girls should never reproduce until at least in their 20s, would have mystified early hominids.)
Sex differences in intelligence vary by race. Gerhard Meisenburg is among those who have found a male advantage among whites of over 35 percent of a standard deviation (written 0.35d, and equivalent to 5 IQ points), compared to only 0.10d (1.5 points) among blacks. This is consistent with J. P. Rushton’s finding that brain mass differences by sex are smaller, both absolutely and relatively, among blacks than whites. Prof. Lynn comments:
The OUT OF AFRICA thesis; the SMART ones left the DUMB ones behind.
In keeping with the usual three-way racial pattern analyzed by Rushton, we would expect to find even larger sex differences in average intelligence among Northeast Asians. This expectation is confirmed by comparisons of 45 sets of Wechsler Full IQ test scores: “Eight of these samples were North East Asians in whom the median male advantage was 0.31d. The other 37 were Europeans in whom the median male advantage was 0.21d.”
Mainstream scientists have been more candid about recognizing sex differences in specific abilities than in overall intelligence, or the general factor g. Even laymen notice that boys tend to do better at math than girls, while girls do better on verbal tests. Formal research supports this.
Adult men have an advantage of 0.29d, or 4.35 IQ points, over women in nonverbal reasoning. In verbal reasoning, their advantage is smaller: 0.16d in comprehension. Males have a greater mathematical problem-solving ability of 0.29d in high school, which increases to 0.32d in college. The average male advantage on the SAT math test has declined, but boys consistently do better than girls, especially at the highest levels.
Early feminists enjoying the fruits of men’s work.
The largest male advantages are found not in mathematics, however, but in spatial abilities. A 2019 meta-analysis found male advantages of 0.23d in visualization, 0.48d in spatial perception, and 0.66d in “mental rotation,” meaning the ability to visualize how an object will look when rotated so as to be seen from another angle. This last figure is the largest sex difference of any kind that has been identified, and Wechsler tests are designed to exclude it entirely. In spatial ability overall, men have an advantage of .46d, equivalent to around seven (7) IQ points. These differences correlate with hormone levels; women exposed to higher levels of pre-natal testosterone have better spatial abilities than other women. Male superiority in spatial abilities is probably an evolutionary adaptation to hunting.
Men have an advantage over women in general knowledge. A 2002 study by Richard Lynn and two colleagues measured the difference as 0.51d. The difference is largest in the categories of Current Affairs, Physical Health and Recreation, Arts, and Sciences. Women score higher than males in the category of Family.
Men have faster reaction times than women, and it will come as a surprise to no one that men throw more accurately than women, whether at stationary or moving targets. The difference shows up by age four and is independent of male superiority in spatial abilities. The evolutionary advantage for hunting should be obvious.
Girls have an advantage in verbal abilities, which persists through the end of high school but is lost in adulthood. However, their advantage in verbal fluency — defined as “the ability to produce a larger number of words in a particular category (e.g., birds, dogs, etc.)” — persists throughout life. Girls do better than boys at tests of reading ability, reading comprehension, and writing ability. These advantages are probably part of their greater verbal ability in youth.
Girls and women also enjoy an advantage in learning second languages. This is probably because, in early humans as among the great apes, females were exogamous: They moved to join the group to which their mates belonged, while males stayed put. In cases of conquest as well, females became the prey of the victors, and their chances of survival and successful motherhood were better if they were good at picking up foreign speech.
Women enjoy an advantage in visual memory and remembering where things are located. These appear to be adaptations to foraging and gathering plant food, just as men’s spatial and throwing abilities are adaptations to hunting. A female advantage in spelling is probably a consequence of better visual memory.
Women are faster at perception and processing in tasks involving “the ability to make rapid comparisons among a number of designs (letters, numbers or pictures).” Female infants display better hand-eye coordination than male infants.
Sleep trouble for women. How did HE leave the toilet seat. Up or Down?
Episodic memory is the ability to remember past experiences, such as what one was doing yesterday. Women are better at this for verbal data as well as “things which cannot easily be placed along the verbal-spatial continuum, such as faces, odour, taste and colour.” Men have better episodic memory for spatial tasks.
Finally, females have better social cognition, meaning an ability to decode non-verbal cues and infer what other people are thinking. Prof. Lynn finds no evolutionary explanation for this, but I have heard it speculated that it may be an adaption to caring for children too young to speak or because they have to deal with men, who are stronger and more violent than they are.
One of the best attested sex differences in intelligence is the wider distribution of male intelligence, with more men than women at both the high and low ends of the bell curve.
Although the cover illustration of Prof. Lynn’s book appears to be based on this difference, he refers to this only in the final paragraph! This difference may go at least as far towards explaining high male achievement as an average IQ difference of four points.
Gerhard P. BISCHOF 
You must be logged in to post a comment.