A very big number of these new “Americans” are Haitians. A horde of persons that are hardly going to enrich the United States culturally or financially.

John Baker – in his book Race (1974) – argues that a society originates a “civilization” if, prior to influence from outsiders, most of its members meet most of the 21 requirements given below.

Indicia of Civilization:

In the ordinary circumstances of life in public places, they cover the external genital organs and the greater part of the trunk with clothes.

Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They keep the body clean and take care to dispose of its waste products.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They do not practice severe mutilation or deformation of the body, except for medical reasons.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They have knowledge of building in brick or stone, if the necessary materials are available in their territory.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No  

(African huts were built with vegetation and mud, never more than one story.)

Many of them live in towns or cities, which are linked by roads.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They cultivate food-plants.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No (Not until Caucasians taught them how to.)

They domesticate animals and use some of the larger ones for transport (or have in the past so used them), if suitable species are available.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

(Domesticating animals requires not only foregoing the instant gratification of eating them, but also caring for them until they have reproduced. Even then, one must plan still farther ahead by eating only the worst animals, saving the best for reproduction. Such long-term planning was not to be found in pre-White Sub-Saharan Africans.)

They have a knowledge of the use of metals, if these are available.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They use wheels.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They exchange property by the use of money.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They order their society by a system of laws, which are enforced in such a way that they ordinarily go about their various concerns in times of peace without danger of attack or arbitrary arrest.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They permit accused persons to defend themselves and to bring witnesses for their defence.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They do not use torture to extract information or for punishment.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They do not practice cannibalism.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

Their religious systems include ethical elements and are not purely or grossly superstitious.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

They use a script (not simply a succession of pictures) to communicate ideas.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No (Not until Caucasians showed them how to.)

There is some facility in the abstract use of numbers, without consideration of actual objects (or in other words, at least a start has been made in mathematics).
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

A calendar is in use, accurate to within a few days in the year.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

Arrangements are made for the instruction of the young in intellectual subjects.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

There is some appreciation of the fine arts.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

Knowledge and understanding are valued as ends in themselves.
Asians: Yes | Caucasians: Yes | Sub-Saharan Africans: No

White, Asian and sub-Saharan African evolution:

It’s laughably nonsensical to claim that Caucasians and Asians are descended from humanoids that migrated out of Africa 65 thousand years ago. The proof of this is the man-made tools and artefacts found in east Asia that can be dated to long before 100,000 years ago. And likewise with prehistoric tools found in Europe.

The last common ancestor Whites and Asians had with sub-Saharan blacks was Australopithecus about 4 million years ago. Australopithecus evolved in Asia, and when the split took place Asians and Whites evolved along a different trajectory than the line which gave rise to chimpanzees, African gorillas and negros. The line which evolved this latter group actually migrated into Africa.

The line which split from Australopithecus and evolved Asians and Caucasians also gave rise to orangutans. The parenting skills of modern female orangutans is more evolved than that of modern sub-Saharan negro women. Today an orangutan mother gives much more long-term care, tenderness and love to her offspring than does a sub-Saharan negro mother.

In fact, an orangutan mother’s parenting skills compared to a negro mother’s skills is closer to that of Asian and Caucasian mothers. This is just more proof that the lines which evolved Asian/Whites/orangutans split millions of years ago from the line which gave rise to chimps/gorillas and negros.

Negro behaviour:

Sub-Saharan Africans have a post-orbital constriction which is a pinching of the skull just behind the eye sockets. This pinching of the skull is to allow more room for larger chewing muscles which accompanies the negro’s prognathic jaw. The negro’s prognathic jaw and larger jaw muscles are needed for their natural diet of raw and tough vegetation and tearing apart uncooked meat.

This post-orbital constriction means there is less room in the skull for the negro’s forebrain than there is in a White or Asian skull. Thus, the negro’s forebrain is physiologically different and much smaller than that of Asians and Whites. The forebrain is where the centre for planning and abstract thought are located in Whites and Asians. The negros don’t have this centre and therefore are mostly incapable of abstract thought or planning. The negro cranium is also denser and thicker than the craniums of Asians and Whites, therefore, not only is the forebrain completely different, the rest of the brain is also smaller.

This is why negro musical lyrics are simple doggerel and why they can’t plan for the future, or be aware or worry about the future consequences of their actions. The negro simply has not got the brain capacity or mental processing power to be anything other than what they always show themselves to be.

Attempting to educate negros to the level of Whites and Asians is exactly like trying to get a 1980’s era computer without modification to run all the apps and programmes that the 2021 era computer sitting on your desk can easily handle.

The next time someone tells you that a negro can’t tell the difference between kindness and weakness, you are being told a provable scientific fact. This is why every time Whites and Asians advance opportunities and advantages to the negros, the latter’s response is to increase their violence and crime. This is what they are, they can’t help it, no more than a junk-yard dog can help biting an intruder that comes across the fence in the middle of the night.

Interesting fact:

White and Asian males regard the primitive facial features of negros as threatening and unappealing. White women, though, regard the negro prognathic jaw and large jaw muscles as masculine. This masculinity of primitive traits may account for why most black-White miscegenation is White females breeding with negro males. And only a small percentage of miscegenation being White males breeding with negro females.

White women generally find Asian males with their neotenic (baby-like features) faces unappealing. But White males find the neotenic faces of Asian females feminine and thus attractive. So, the White males lose their females to the negros but gains a higher IQ Asian female. A win win, as it were.

A joke that Eastern Europeans have in the United Kingdom goes like this: “If you see a white woman pushing a pram on the street how can you tell if she’s British or East European? You look in the pram, if it contains a black baby the mother is British, if a White baby the mother is East European”. This indicates the phenomenal rate of miscegenation in Great Britain.

The main body of info in this comment and the statistics come from the book Erectus Walks Amongst Us by Richard D. Fuerle.

https://www.unz.com/article/open-borders-and-affluent-americans/